Intructions: Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by expanding upon their reflections, making connections to your perceptions, and offering additional insights.
Response to a colleague discussion post
Nursing Problems in Research Studies and QI/DNP Projects
In the field of nursing, addressing specific problems is critical for advancing evidence-based practice (EBP). Nursing research studies often focus on gaps in knowledge, while quality improvement (QI) and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) projects target gaps in practice. Understanding and addressing these problems drive innovation and enhance patient care.
Identifying Nursing Problems and Defining Gaps
Research Studies:
Nursing research typically addresses a gap in knowledge by exploring phenomena or identifying underlying factors influencing patient outcomes. For instance, a research study may investigate the barriers to medication adherence among patients with chronic illnesses. The identified problem—non-adherence—highlights the lack of understanding regarding patient behaviors and motivations, leading to the development of new insights or frameworks.
QI/DNP Projects:
In contrast, QI and DNP projects address a gap in practice by implementing interventions to improve care processes or outcomes. For example, a QI project may focus on reducing emergency department wait times through workflow optimization. The problem here is operational inefficiency, which is addressed through evidence-based interventions applied in real-world settings.
Comparing and Contrasting the Presentation of Problems
In research studies, the nursing problem is often framed as a theoretical inquiry or hypothesis. For example, the research question might be: “What factors influence medication adherence in patients with diabetes?” This framing seeks to generate knowledge that can later inform practice.
In QI and DNP projects, the problem is presented as a practical issue requiring immediate resolution, such as: “How can a patient education program improve medication adherence in diabetic patients within six months?” This problem framing is more solution-focused, emphasizing the implementation and evaluation of interventions.
While research emphasizes discovery, QI and DNP projects prioritize application. Both approaches, however, influence nursing practice positively—research by expanding the evidence base and QI/DNP projects by operationalizing evidence to enhance outcomes.
Key Measurements/Variables in Research, QI, and DNP Projects
Research Study: Patient-reported reasons for non-adherence to medication, collected through surveys or interviews, serve as a key variable. This data helps identify knowledge gaps and inform targeted interventions.
QI Project: The rate of medication adherence before and after an educational intervention is a critical measurement. This metric evaluates the intervention’s effectiveness in changing patient behavior.
DNP Project: A key variable might be patient hemoglobin A1C levels before and after implementing a structured diabetes education program. This measurement assesses the program’s impact on long-term glycemic control.
Each variable aligns with the project’s goals, providing actionable data to inform practice improvements.
Critique of the Question Development Tool (Hicks, 2024)
Hicks (2024) introduced a question development tool designed to align the nursing problem, EBP question, and measurement in a cohesive framework. This tool ensures that nursing projects are methodologically sound and outcome-focused.
Strengths:
The tool fosters clarity by aligning the identified problem with an actionable EBP question. For instance, if the problem is low medication adherence, the EBP question could be: “Does a structured education program improve medication adherence among diabetic patients?” This alignment ensures consistency across the project’s components.
Limitations:
The tool’s emphasis on measurable outcomes may inadvertently exclude qualitative dimensions, such as patient satisfaction or emotional well-being. Additionally, its structured approach might limit the exploration of complex, multifaceted nursing problems that require iterative question refinement.
Opportunities for Improvement:
Incorporating flexibility into the tool could allow for addressing qualitative aspects and adapting the question as new insights emerge during the project lifecycle. Including provisions for mixed-method approaches would further enhance its applicability.
Conclusion
Nursing problems, whether addressed in research or QI/DNP projects, serve as the foundation for improving patient care. Research focuses on closing knowledge gaps, while QI and DNP initiatives target actionable changes in practice. By understanding how nursing problems are framed and measured, nurses can contribute to a culture of continuous improvement. Tools like Hicks’ (2024) question development framework ensure that projects are coherent, evidence-based, and impactful.